Local Politics Education Agriculture Canadian Press

Bragg Creek group raises concerns about logging

Jan 09, 2012 06:00 am | By Dawn Smith | Rocky View Weekly

A group of Bragg Creek and Calgary residents, campers, trail users and outdoor enthusiasts is raising awareness about scheduled logging to take place near the community.

Sustain Kananaskis, made up of about a dozen volunteers, is seeking public consultation before the logging starts. The group’s website states the logging will have a direct impact on 90 per cent of the area’s local trails.

“We want to see the public be consulted about forest management,” said Ralph Cartar, Sustain Kananaskis member.

“This is an incredibly important forest… let’s talk about it. Right now we aren’t being listened to.”

As part of Alberta’s forest management plan to reduce the threat of forest fires near Bragg Creek, Spray Lake Sawmills will begin work this summer logging more than 1,700 acres of trees, the equivalent of seven square kilometres, in the West Bragg Creek area.

According to the group’s website, the logging blocks will be located directly next to or surrounding at least 25 kilometres of recreational ski, cycling, equestrian, hiking and snowshoeing trails.

According to Cartar, a University of Calgary biology professor and member of the Bragg Creek Environmental Coalition, selectively removing old growth forests, mainly lodge pole pine in this case, will not keep the community safe from fires.

“They are misinforming the process,” said Cartar.

“Logging doesn’t decrease the risk of fire at all. They aren’t being protected… by doing this logging. The only thing that would protect us is to remove the (entire) forest.”

Cartar, who has been a professor for 18 years, is particularly concerned about the loss of biodiversity should the logging take place.

“I like nature and what offends me about Spray’s logging plans and the Spray Lakes plan in general… is what they are doing to biodiversity,” he said. “They aren’t allowing old growth in the system. As an ecologist, I am deeply offended by the lack of biodiversity.”

Cartar said the group’s other concerns include loss of recreation, an impact on the economy of Bragg Creek and the possible impact on downstream water quality.

“This is the most important public forest possibly anywhere in North America, used hugely by recreationalists, and it has a huge economic value to Bragg Creek,” he said.

“This is too important to rush through.”

Dwayne Zaba, an area realtor, agreed.

“The appeal of Kananaskis is as a world-class mountain park,” he said. “(Logging) radically affects the appeal and absolutely affects property values. It is really short-sighted. It just seems absurd that they would even comtemplate allowing Spray Lakes to (log) that area.”

Cartar said the group is encouraging people to share their concerns with representatives from Spray Lakes Sawmills and Alberta’s Sustainable Resources Development (SRD), the government department that approves logging permits.

Gord Lehn, Spray Lakes Sawmills’ woodlands manager, said the company is interested in the group’s concerns.

“We want to work together with them,” he said. “We are all in this together. We want to do what is right out there as well.”

Spray Lakes forest management plan has been in place for decades, said Lehn, and is a combination plan for grazing, logging, recreation and fire protection.

“It is not just a logging plan, it is also a firesmart plan to help provide some fire protection for the community,” he said, adding that a number of stakeholders, such as members of the ranching community, recreational groups and nearby municipalities had a hand in its creation.

Lehn said many of the area’s current trails were originally logging roads.

“A good chunk were originally intended for logging,” he said. “As a company, we have been logging in the east slopes since 1943. If this is still regarded as pristine (land with) high watershed values, to me that is an indication that we have been doing something right.”

The lands under question were identified for logging about five years ago and the broader community was given a chance to speak out at that time, said Lehn. However, Spray Lakes is hosting another open house on Jan. 26 from 3 to 7 p.m. at the Bragg Creek Community Centre to allow residents to view the proposed plan, raise concerns and bring suggestions.

Lehn encourages people to come out to the meeting to hear the plan, which he says will help bring the forest to a more natural state through patch cutting and reclamation.

Company staff will be on hand to answer questions and gather feedback and maps showing the cut blocks will be on display at the open house.

For more information on the proposal and the Sustain Kananaskis group, visit www.sustaink.ca

Comments

Huckleberry said:
They have been designing large fire breaks in Banff and Jasper National parks for years and have been using the same logging equipment to clear them. The Parks staff recognize that there is a need for disturbance in our ecosystems to maintain their health and to maintain biodiversity. They are also concerned with public safety and have managed to be successful in both areas. If this can be done to reduce the risk in a National Park, why can't it be done here?
January 11, 2012 @ 3:46 pm Report Abuse
Forums message number 334331 has been flagged as offensive by a user.

Category:
Category 2:
Category 3:
message ID: 334331
Post On: January 11, 2012
Posted by User #: Huckleberry
Posted by IP:

message:
They have been designing large fire breaks in Banff and Jasper National parks for years and have been using the same logging equipment to clear them. The Parks staff recognize that there is a need for disturbance in our ecosystems to maintain their health and to maintain biodiversity. They are also concerned with public safety and have managed to be successful in both areas. If this can be done to reduce the risk in a National Park, why can't it be done here?
Breezie said:
I agree with Mr. Potter the real bad guys in all of this are Sustainable Resource Development (SRD). They are the government department that has put the fox (Spray Lake Sawmills (SLS)) in charge of the hen house (forest), and said to them (SLS) you make sure everyone is ok with how you mind the hen house without any prescription of how that is to be done. Hence the necessity for public consultation now!

If Spray Lake Sawmills were indeed interested in working together why then have 98% of the users not been informed of the planned clear cutting? Instead the users have only coming to learn of the logging plans through the Sustain Kananaskis campaign. Also when is there going to be an open house in Calgary to collect their input?

Regarding the aforementioned fire protection. Clear cutting is not the only means of achieving this. Further Mr. Lehn fails to mention what percentage of the proposed logging plans are for fire protection. As hundreds of acres in their plan are simply for logging and not fire protection, I find it insulting personally to have the scare tactic of fire protection being used so readily. I hope their presentation at the open house will clearly show and quantify what part of the plan is for Firesmarting and what the alternatives are to clear cutting.

As for the nearby municipalities having a hand in the creation of the SLS's plan, what seems to have ignored is the public's input on the Rocky View County's Firesmart plan obtained through public consultation process. In that process a clear sentiment was expressed by Rockyview County residents requesting the County's Firesmart plan not prescribe clear cutting the crown lands adjacent to Bragg Creek. Clearly the current local sentiment is not being considered but I guess that is what you would expect from companies that do not possess conscience.

As for the statement that recreational groups have had a hand in the plan, I would be interested in knowing which organizations those were and what input they provided and how representative that input was of mine. I hope that too will be on display at the open house.

As for the trails being old logging roads Mr. Lehn is quite correct. What he fails to mention is those trails were created in valley bottoms and are very wet making them unsuitable for year round use. This has recently resulted in the creation of 47 Kilometers of new trails designed for all season use. If the logging proceeds as planned it is reasonable to expect all the area trails to become abandon due to the watershed and biodiversity issues and the impact on physical and visual aesthetics. 

The bottom line is this open house can not possibly address the many issues with SLS's plans. Only true facilitated public consultation will resolve this and since SRD will not prescribe it we must. Have a voice!
January 9, 2012 @ 7:44 pm Report Abuse
Forums message number 334320 has been flagged as offensive by a user.

Category:
Category 2:
Category 3:
message ID: 334320
Post On: January 9, 2012
Posted by User #: Breezie
Posted by IP:

message:
I agree with Mr. Potter the real bad guys in all of this are Sustainable Resource Development (SRD). They are the government department that has put the fox (Spray Lake Sawmills (SLS)) in charge of the hen house (forest), and said to them (SLS) you make sure everyone is ok with how you mind the hen house without any prescription of how that is to be done. Hence the necessity for public consultation now!

If Spray Lake Sawmills were indeed interested in working together why then have 98% of the users not been informed of the planned clear cutting? Instead the users have only coming to learn of the logging plans through the Sustain Kananaskis campaign. Also when is there going to be an open house in Calgary to collect their input?

Regarding the aforementioned fire protection. Clear cutting is not the only means of achieving this. Further Mr. Lehn fails to mention what percentage of the proposed logging plans are for fire protection. As hundreds of acres in their plan are simply for logging and not fire protection, I find it insulting personally to have the scare tactic of fire protection being used so readily. I hope their presentation at the open house will clearly show and quantify what part of the plan is for Firesmarting and what the alternatives are to clear cutting.

As for the nearby municipalities having a hand in the creation of the SLS's plan, what seems to have ignored is the public's input on the Rocky View County's Firesmart plan obtained through public consultation process. In that process a clear sentiment was expressed by Rockyview County residents requesting the County's Firesmart plan not prescribe clear cutting the crown lands adjacent to Bragg Creek. Clearly the current local sentiment is not being considered but I guess that is what you would expect from companies that do not possess conscience.

As for the statement that recreational groups have had a hand in the plan, I would be interested in knowing which organizations those were and what input they provided and how representative that input was of mine. I hope that too will be on display at the open house.

As for the trails being old logging roads Mr. Lehn is quite correct. What he fails to mention is those trails were created in valley bottoms and are very wet making them unsuitable for year round use. This has recently resulted in the creation of 47 Kilometers of new trails designed for all season use. If the logging proceeds as planned it is reasonable to expect all the area trails to become abandon due to the watershed and biodiversity issues and the impact on physical and visual aesthetics. 

The bottom line is this open house can not possibly address the many issues with SLS's plans. Only true facilitated public consultation will resolve this and since SRD will not prescribe it we must. Have a voice!
Greg Potter said:
Clear Cut “logging blocks” are not a Fire Break
Does Spray Lakes really think the public is that NaĂŻve?
There would absolutely be value in a Fire Break to provide some protection for the Bragg Creek Area – so let’s see a plan for a maintained fire break – not a one-time logging operation!

The West Bragg Creek area is the closest recreationally developed forest reserve lands to Calgary – a city of over a million people. The current clear cut logging plan threatens significant portions of the recreational trails in the area. If this current plan goes ahead It will be more than two generations before the cut blocks can re-grow to their current state of maturity. The recreational value of this area to Albertans over more than two generations is worth far more than the one time benefit to Albertans as a result of clear cut logging it!

Then there’s the whole issue of value of the watershed. Beyond local water quality concerns the Elbow watershed supplies approximately one half of Calgary’s water.

But let’s not point the finger at Spray Lakes Saw Mills – they are just a corporation trying to make a dollar. Corporations don’t have a conscience – it’s up to the public to hold them accountable to the values of our society. What we should really be concerned about is that our Alberta government is considering allowing this to happen. The government is supposed to be representing our interests – let them know what you think!
January 9, 2012 @ 5:07 pm Report Abuse
Forums message number 334319 has been flagged as offensive by a user.

Category:
Category 2:
Category 3:
message ID: 334319
Post On: January 9, 2012
Posted by User #: Greg Potter
Posted by IP:

message:
Clear Cut “logging blocks” are not a Fire Break
Does Spray Lakes really think the public is that NaĂŻve?
There would absolutely be value in a Fire Break to provide some protection for the Bragg Creek Area – so let’s see a plan for a maintained fire break – not a one-time logging operation!

The West Bragg Creek area is the closest recreationally developed forest reserve lands to Calgary – a city of over a million people. The current clear cut logging plan threatens significant portions of the recreational trails in the area. If this current plan goes ahead It will be more than two generations before the cut blocks can re-grow to their current state of maturity. The recreational value of this area to Albertans over more than two generations is worth far more than the one time benefit to Albertans as a result of clear cut logging it!

Then there’s the whole issue of value of the watershed. Beyond local water quality concerns the Elbow watershed supplies approximately one half of Calgary’s water.

But let’s not point the finger at Spray Lakes Saw Mills – they are just a corporation trying to make a dollar. Corporations don’t have a conscience – it’s up to the public to hold them accountable to the values of our society. What we should really be concerned about is that our Alberta government is considering allowing this to happen. The government is supposed to be representing our interests – let them know what you think!
   

Got something to say?

Post Comment

You haven't entered any comments to post!

The Rocky View Weekly welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.

In order to post comments on our web site, you must validate your email address. An email was sent to you when you registered that included an activation link. If you have not yet done so, please click on the link to activate your account.

If you did not receive your activation email, please click here to have it resent.

In order to post comments, you must be logged in.

Already a member? Login here!

Not yet a member of the site? Register here!